Do any of them know what the word “liberal” actually means?

  • AWildMimicAppears
    link
    fedilink
    126 months ago

    to be fair, the word “liberal” has lost its meaning in the US, because there no differentiation between economic liberalism and social liberalism. the guy in the meme would be a classic socialist in europe. we do have liberals here too, but they are the economic liberalism-type and more in line with the US-Republicans in economic questions, like tax cuts for the rich and businesses.

    • @retrospectology
      link
      -1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s as meaningless as any words that hang on the notion that there’s a “spectrum”.

      You either you accept what works and fosters human well being and liberty, adjusting your politics accordingly to reality as we learn more about the world, or you’re conservative, a fundementally irrational denial of reality.

      This is why seemingly different groups like Marxists and neo-nazis end up at the same place ultimately; they’re unwilling to give up on failed ideas. It doesn’t matter what label one applies, if you’re still trying failed ideas after they’ve produced untold amounts of harm then you’re just on one road to fascism or another.

      It’s a binary, not a spectrum.

      • AWildMimicAppears
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Lol thats great, i came under a “biden bad”-post just a few hours ago to the same conclusion. the best friend of a left-authoritarian isn’t anyone on the left wing, its an right-authoritarian.

        i’m a socialist with anarchism as an ideal in some aspects, and for quite a while i couldn’t understand why anyone on the left side of the spectrum would actively lobby against biden in the upcoming election until i realized that.

        • @retrospectology
          link
          -16 months ago

          Biden literally supports genocide, so it is reasonable for people to not want to support him even if it comes at a cost to themselves. If you’re unable to understand that, even if you disagree, I very much doubt you are aligned with the kind of goals you purport.

          • @cmbabul
            link
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You clearly don’t understand that America as an institution has supported genocide your entire life and longer, it’s just more in your face right now than it’s ever been, Biden may support genocide but so did Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Ike, Truman, FDR, Hoover, and on back. This isn’t new shit and yes we desperately need better, but the genocide of the people you are arguing for will continue either way, but it will be faster with Trump. If you feel this strongly about stoping the US support of genocide regardless of who is president, I suggest you look into direct action, if you don’t have the backbone for that shut the fuck up.

            Your vote isn’t a declaration of loyalty, love, support, or condoning. It never has been in this country, what it is is a small expression of which of the two directions presented to you is preferable. In this iteration we are presented with the maintenance of the status quo, which is fucking so stupid and I in every other circumstance would fight tooth and nail against it, but the other option is authoritarian christofascism which will culminate in at the very minimum of a constitutional crisis when blue states refuse to enforce the Gilead bullshit while thousands are murdered in red states. You want to stop genocide in Gaza? Me too, it’s gonna be hard to do that when there’s a cleansing happening in the US.

            It’s a fucked up system, I hate it too, but again the only other option than these two ancient assholes is direct action and that has a lot of other consequences even if they are worth it in the long run

            • @retrospectology
              link
              06 months ago

              So I’m going to just tell you this; what you’re doing above is not convincing anyone.

              Given that factual reality, you then have to ask yourself, as someone who probably likes to believe that you’re pragmatic and worldly; if your strategy for convincing millions of voters to support Democrats inspite of their increasingly fascist, right-wing tendencies is not working, what are your other practical options for actually helping Biden win.

              And remember, this might involve changing your politics, or getting off the fence and actually doing something etc.

              In any case, it’s a rhetorical question, since I’ll be blocking you. Think about it though, think about 2016 and how badly your political strategy failed this country then. Consider changing.

              • @Cryophilia
                link
                16 months ago

                Leftists literally threatening the country with a fascist takeover if Dems don’t bow to their impossible demands.

                We’re not trying to win your vote. We’re trying to stop you from infecting more undecideds. You people are rotten and need to be cut out of the process before you kill us all.

                • @retrospectology
                  link
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  What? Biden is the one playing chicken with our democracy, all he has to do is not give the middle finger to people who want him to stop funding a genocide. It’s not like anyone is even expecting him to fight for healthcare or climate change or anything, literally just the very bare minimum of not sending money and arms to kill children and people would stomach voting for him. But no, you won’t even compromise on that.

                  You honestly sound like you don’t actually believe in the democratic process at all “Vote how I want you to or you don’t deserve a vote.”

                  No wonder you guys and the Republicans go together like hand and glove.

                  • @Cryophilia
                    link
                    06 months ago

                    Gaslight <---- you are here

                    Obstruct

                    Project

    • @Cryophilia
      link
      -26 months ago

      There’s a huge differentiation between social and economic liberalism! Liberals in the US means almost exclusively social liberalism. Liberal in the us is progressivism.

      Economic liberalism is a Republican position, not a Democrat one.

      @[email protected] I promise this is the last one, I’ve made my point

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        You’ve made it clear that you believe words do not have meanings, and are just vibes, yes.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          -26 months ago

          300 million people having the same vibe

            • @Cryophilia
              link
              -16 months ago

              Multiple definitions of words can exist. When 300 million people agree on a definition, that’s a valid definition.

              Also, the RIDICULOUS ARROGANCE of Europeans never fails to astound me. 9 billion people? You really do think you represent the whole world lol. News flash, the colonial era is over, you lost your empires. Just stop, you’re embarrassing yourself.

              • Cowbee [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                I’m not a European, lol. The entire world and the entirety of academia understands Liberalism the way most people on Lwmmy use it, ie to refer to a pro-Capitalist ideology.

                • @Cryophilia
                  link
                  -16 months ago

                  That makes it even more sad you’re simping for a colonialist view