• @distantsounds
    link
    English
    27 months ago

    It’s an arbitrary percentage they came up with in 2000. It should be lower, and it’s not like they stick closely to their own made up rules.

    Lowering the percentage would be another step toward breaking this ridiculous 2 party system.

      • @distantsounds
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Hard disagree. He has the possibility to siphon off enough trump voters to maybe give Biden a way to win. We also didn’t have two 80 year olds on stage back then. The people deserve debate edit: this even if all we are allowed to add is someone with a starved-dead worm in their brain.

          • @distantsounds
            link
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            There is no way he’s pulling anyone away from Biden lol Especially at this point considering Biden’s stance on Israel. AND yes, the society should see what state the “democracy” is in, it’s the only way for people to maybe get the hint that the current system is broken and needs to be fixed.
            Edit: if debates don’t have effect on outcomes, why would it even matter then? lol

              • @distantsounds
                link
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                That’s from December of last year lol AND are we all accepting poll from Monmouth university as facts? lol

                  • @distantsounds
                    link
                    English
                    07 months ago

                    Again, are we considering polls to be counted as factual? Especially pre-dead-worm-in-brain announcement? Polling is inaccurate and the current methods of capture are outdated and don’t offer a reflective sample. Polls are not something you can say are factual