• @TimeNaan
    link
    English
    217 days ago

    Robotics are not that great at fighting against insurgencies. Just like most technology, it usually isn’t enough to destroy movements that are popular among the wider population. Look at the Afghanistan war for example.

    • @Lumisal
      link
      English
      117 days ago

      I should clarify: advanced autonomous robotics.

      • @TimeNaan
        link
        English
        117 days ago

        Ok, but that’s not the point I was making. I meant that vast technological superiority does not mean military superiority.

        Guerrillas and militias have been very effective at combatting powerful empires throughout history because they have the backing of the populace and can hide and resupply with ease, unlike invading forces.

        This will not change because of a single technological advancement, especially since insurgents can also use this technology themselves.

        • @Lumisal
          link
          English
          417 days ago

          That’s not a single technological advancement though, it’s multiple.

          But either way, I think it’ll make a difference because it eliminates a big factor that’s always been present:

          Humans.

          Autonomous robots would never tire, would be able to maintain themselves to a degree, and the controlling force never has to worry about their loyalty. Also eases stress on the empire’s citizens because they’re not the ones being sent to fight anymore, either. Easier to do the bread and circuses.

          Hopefully I’ll be wrong about it.