• @Son_of_dad
    link
    English
    206 months ago

    What an oddly difficult guide to read

    • @tacosplease
      link
      English
      216 months ago

      I like it. Feels intuitive to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        It’s terrible. It’s missing an explanation for what the outflow part from “groundwater” is.

        • Glowy
          link
          English
          8
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It isn’t showing an outflow from the groundwater slice, each circle is an expanded view of the small slice in the circle above. The only thing missing is the percentage of the small slice in the circle where it begins. The soil, atmosphere, and organism water are not falling under groundwater, they are just much smaller slices of the freshwater circle.

          If you want to make it much easier to read, separate saltwater and freshwater, and change the bottom charts percentages from 52% and 38% to 0.52% and 0.38%.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          56 months ago

          “Surface water,” presumably.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            That doesn’t make sense. Water in living organisms, water vapour in the air and in the soil are not surface water.

            This chart is truly terrible throughout.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I don’t find it difficult to read. Most of the freshwater consists of groundwater and ice; the rest is made up of what’s shown in the circle at the bottom.

      • @radicalautonomy
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        It wouldn’t have been hard to just include those last three percentages.

        • @tacosplease
          link
          English
          26 months ago

          I’ll give you that. No more wheels, but value labels for those would have been good.