• @Jimmyeatsausage
    link
    46 months ago

    Probably not yet…at least, not good, solid numbers. There’s a study out of the University of Michigan that claimed to find that certain PFAS chemicals could double the risk for certain cancers in women with previous cancer diagnoses. Sounds from the abstract that it was just a correlational study (meaning it just shows a relationship between exposure and risk, but doesn’t show that PFAS caused the increased risk…if you’re interested in why a correlation doesn’t establish causation, this site is a fun way to learn more https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations)

    There’s a lot of different PFAS chemicals and a lot of different cancers, so there’s gonna be a lot of work required to nail it all down.

    https://dceg.cancer.gov/research/what-we-study/pfas https://sph.umich.edu/news/2023posts/exposure-to-pfas-chemicals-doubles-the-odds-of-a-prior-cancer-diagnosis-in-women.html#:~:text=Exposure to PFAS chemicals doubles,prior cancer diagnosis in women

    • Optional
      link
      56 months ago

      It’s in the article. They typed it up all nice with good words and a nice font and everything.

      • @Jimmyeatsausage
        link
        -26 months ago

        The article is several thousand words…none of which talk about a causal link or dose response in humans, which is the demographic I assumed the person I was replying to was curious about. It took me less time to find primary sources and link them than to read the biography of Ms. Hanson.

        • Optional
          link
          06 months ago

          Cool, cool. So what’s the verdict? What’d you find?

          • @Jimmyeatsausage
            link
            26 months ago

            It’s in the link I posted. They typed it up all nice with good words and a nice font and everything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -36 months ago

      Thanks ! That’s a way better answer than the other guy who recommended blocking all lemmy.ml users, instead of answering. Still the previous comment has 10x more negative votes so any dissenting voices are already silenced by the cultists even before we get deamplified, blocked, deleted and banned.