• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    How about any photo realistic image without a watermark is illegal? And the watermark kind of has to be traced back to author so you can’t just add it to real CP?

    • @solrize
      link
      11 month ago

      If you can generate the watermarks, you can put them on non-AI images.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        Well the watermark would be a kind of signature that leads back to a registered artist.

        I think it makes sense to enforce this for all AI art, basically label it in a way that can be traced back to who produced it.

        And if you don’t want people to know you produced it, then you probably shouldn’t share it

        • @solrize
          link
          41 month ago

          Sorry but the concept of a “registered artist” sounds dystopian.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 month ago

            It would be for using AI, not creating art.

            I’m just brainstorming here, but I can’t imagine how you would control AI art without some sort of regulation or licensing on the side of the AI creator…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              You’re quite correct your thinking it seems unrealistic to actually detect AI generated imagery after the fact so the only fill solution would be a trusted chain of custody - it wouldn’t necessarily need a centralized authority but it would require some highly trusted issuers of trust and, unfortunately, trust in media is currently at an all time low and those companies are in the best position to serve as those issuers.

              This is a very complicated problem and we need a social (rather than a technical) solution.