• @timmymac
    link
    -56 months ago

    The people shooting people will not be paying these taxes. Another law that punishes law abiding citizens.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -16 months ago

      No citizen should own a gun so its a good step to tax them more. Should be much higher though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yeah, states like Utah, Arizona, Nevada are much too far away and will definitely stop you from buying guns and bullets in their states/ bringing them over the borders.

        • @chiliedogg
          link
          26 months ago

          Do you think people are buying pistols from guns shops and neighboring states and bringing them to California? How about rifles that are illegal in California. Are people buying those at gun shops in other states to?

          Most people reading this far are probably thinking “Yes” because people don’t know shit about gun laws.

          When a dealer sees an out of state license, they have to apply the laws of both the state in which the gun is being sold AND the state in which the buyer resides. When I sold guns in Texas and someone came in from New Jersey to buy a rifle, I had to do a New Jersey background check, run their Firearm Purchaser ID, etc on top of our usual process. I also had to make sure the gun I was selling them was legal in New Jersey.

          Oh - and handguns can’t be transferred to an individual in another state. Period. If someone from another state wantred to buy a handgun from us, we had to ship it to a licensed dealer in their state to complete the transfer. The only exception is for federal Curio and Relic license holder buying an antique pistol that’s been unaltered (e.g. a C&R collector buying an authentic WWII German Luger).

          Ammo: sure. People can buy that out of state easy enough. And I don’t see a problem with that. The person who wants 5,000 rounds of 9mm wants it because they are practicing. If people are going to own guns, they should be able to afford to train on them enough to shoot in a straight line, which is way harder than a lot of you non-gun folk seem to think.

          And I’m way less-suspicious of the guy who wants 5,000 bullets than the guy who wants 5.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            That’s weird considering I just saw a former cop sell a pistol in California that was definitely illegal to purchase. I asked them about it and apparently it’s fine to purchase it from someone who acquired it legally, as long as they were law enforcement or former law enforcement.

            Also, and I can’t believe this needs to be pointed out, we’re discussing illegally smuggling weapons and ammunition. If your mentality is “but it’s not legal” then I don’t even know why we’re having this conversation. It would not be difficult at all to find someone willing to purchase a gun for you and trade cash for it. They don’t search your car at border crossings, and we haven’t even gotten into ghost guns.

            • @chiliedogg
              link
              16 months ago

              Police are able to buy modern pistols in California, so there’s a thriving straw purchase market in California of police officers buying guns just to sell them at insane markups.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                Seems like this would just succeed in putting money in the hands of the wrong people, no matter how you shake it.

                That, on top of poor people just won’t be able to defend themselves when things inevitably become worse.

      • Cornpop
        link
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That will never happen luckily, at least not in my life. Would never give up my guns. Too much fun. Founding fathers had some great foresight to first separate the church (although the fucking Christians ignore the shit out of that) and second enshrine gun rights. Would be a real shame if a bunch of pansies were able to ruin that for us.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          I don’t think pansies is the right word…

          https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1327/

          This study discusses Nazi gun control. Long story short, the Nazis specifically disarmed minorities (primarily Jews) and prevented them from arming themselves legally, whilst making it easier and easier for the ‘right people’ to defend themselves.

          Funny enough, this kind of law would only serve to take guns and ammunition out of the hands of the poor. Which is exactly why a stupid law like this will get passed, because it goes along with what the conservatives in California govt. want. (In other words, no common sense gun control but they won’t get in the way of something that keeps guns out of poor black people, trans people, not-rich-peoples hands).

          Food for thought, I guess. Not sure why I wrote this.

        • @kerrigan778
          link
          16 months ago

          Those are some kinda true things said unbelievably poorly.

        • @frostysauce
          link
          -16 months ago

          People who don’t fetishize and hide behind guns are pansies, eh?

          • Cornpop
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Don’t hide behind anything. Don’t even carry them around with me. Just love blasting steel targets at my 100 yard range in my front yard. It’s a blast. Try it sometime. Just because some stupid fucks in the city shoot each other doesn’t make it ok to ruin my good time out in the country where I’m not harming anyone.