Most instances don’t have a specific copyright in their ToS, which is basically how copyright is handled on corporate social media (Meta/X/Reddit owns license rights to whatever you post on their platform when you click “Agree”). I’ve noticed some people including Copyright notices in posts (mostly to prevent AI use). Is this necessary, or is the creator the automatic copyright owner? Does adding the copyright/license information do anything?

Please note if you have legal credentials in your reply. (I’m in the USA, but I’d be interested to hear about other jurisdictions if there are differences)

  • @glimse
    link
    36 months ago

    Not sure but at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment

      • @glimse
        link
        26 months ago

        You’re free to reply to a week-old comment, too, but neither is a great idea

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You’re free to reply to a week-old comment, too, but neither is a great idea

          Actually, five days, not a week.

          And also, sometimes its just about making a point, even if you stumble upon something later on. 🤷

          Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

          • @glimse
            link
            26 months ago

            What is that point?

            • Cosmic Cleric
              link
              English
              -3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              What is that point?

              at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment

              You’re free to block those that use the license, if you find it annoying to see.

              Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

              • @glimse
                link
                26 months ago

                The point you felt was worth making a week later is that I am free to block someone who does something I find kind of annoying?

                That seems a little extreme to me. Why would you encourage that?

                • Cosmic Cleric
                  link
                  English
                  -4
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  The point you felt was worth making a week later

                  Again, five days ago. Some people like myself stumble upon a post/comment days and days later from when its initially posted.

                  is that I am free to block someone who does something I find kind of annoying?

                  Yeah, for some reason people who complain about me using a license seem to keep forgetting that option, but instead just continue to complain, for some strange reason, no matter how many times I remind them of that option. Thought it was a good PSA to remind the complainers they they have alternatives to complaining.

                  That seems a little extreme to me.

                  If that seems extreme to you, then you need to touch grass more often.

                  Extreme would be continuing to complain about something that you have the power to change, but don’t change.

                  Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

                  • @glimse
                    link
                    26 months ago

                    I just had a short chat with someone saying something I agreed. It’s not like I’m making posts about it…or replying to week-old comments by someone doing the thing I find annoying.

                    You have to see the irony in this, right? You are way more annoyed at my comment than I am by your clutter.