• @GamingChairModel
      link
      English
      26 months ago

      Yes, but an absence of a proof of the positive is itself not proof of the negative, so if we’re in the unprovable unknown, we’re still back at the point that you can’t prove a negative.

      • @AndrewZabar
        link
        English
        16 months ago

        Well, if the conditions are such that the positive would be absolutely certain to leave evidence, then the lack of said evidence is good enough. Like, I say it’s not snowing where I live. Absolutely nobody in my town sees so much as a single snowflake. Also, it’s 72° out. Haven’t I proven to a reasonable degree that it’s not snowing where I live?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        we’re still back at the point that you can’t prove a negative.

        We were never at the point that you can’t prove a negative. That’s dumb & wrong.

        A woman menstruating proves negative on pregnancy.

        The existence of the largest prime was disproven thousands of years ago.