• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      I don’t really think so, otherwise they probably would have said it. I think you’re just utilizing loaded terminology to suit your argument.

      It would be like seeing the guys from jackass injure themselves in a stunt, and then accusing people who witnessed it of being callous for not being sympathetic. “No one deserves to break their penis for entertainment purposes!”… Well, okay, I guess that’s a nice platitude. But that guy was swinging his dick at an angry bull, and no one was making him do it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I am so tired of this prescriptive bullshit on online forms. If you don’t see it then fine, you don’t see it. But don’t make up some nonsense about me to pretend I didn’t read what I read. We just disagree, it’s that simple.

        Sometimes people mean more than the words in front of you. It’s called nuance, implications, etc. People mean more than what they literally wrote sometimes. Yet for some reason when we are on forums people pretend that doesn’t exist, like interpretation can’t exist ever.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          Well, this would be fine if you weren’t attacking other people’s interpretations…

          Usually when people witness a criticism they want to know the logic behind that criticism.

          People mean more than what they literally wrote sometimes. Yet for some reason when we are on forums people pretend that doesn’t exist

          I think that’s because the whole point of forums is to express your ideas through the written word. Expecting people in a forum to interpret your argument with nuance when you express none is idiotic.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -16 months ago

            So the written word doesn’t contain nuance or implications? It’s never open to interpretation? That’s certainly a take. I am not going to be as dick-ish as you though and call you idiotic.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              46 months ago

              So the written word doesn’t contain nuance or implications? It’s never open to interpretation?

              Man, can you fucking read? The written word contains nuance and implications, but you can’t interpret it from someone’s writing that is devoid of it…

              I can’t say I don’t like lord of the rigs, and then expect people to assume my reasoning is nuanced, or that my statement may spur any further implications.

              That’s certainly a take. I am not going to be as dick-ish as you though and call you idiotic.

              I think we just have interpretations of what I have said. People are allowed to have nuanced opinions. Maybe, idiotic isn’t an implication of being dick-ish to me?

              dick-ish

              No one deserves to be called a dick. Be better.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Oh but I deserved to be called an idiot? Go fuck yourself and spare me the high road nonsense.

                Feel free to have the last word. I’m sure it’s very important to you.