• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    46 months ago

    That doesn’t define every climate movement though, and anyone suggesting it does is acting in bad faith and undermining the entire concept of nonviolent civil disobedience. It’s dumb, sure, kids do lots of dumb stuff but I wouldn’t even call it counterproductive. It sure got people talking and raised awareness, and now the groups tactics have evolved. Anyone that magically ignores the climate catastrophe because someone threw soup at the bulletproof glass covering the Mona Lisa wasn’t actually going to do anything to further the cause anyway. Why not focus your energy on something more productive than shitting on some trivial event that happened awhile back?

    • Optional
      link
      -36 months ago

      It sure got people talking and raised awareness, and now the groups tactics have evolved.

      One would hope their tactics evolved, the awareness of it being incredibly stupid is what people were talking about.

      Public demonstrations are not new. Lessons learned are abundant. Changes in technology are new and that’s what could be useful but making a spectacle and preventing people from going home is not the best avenue, so to speak.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        The post is about an upcoming movement that’s vague on specifics, other than they are focusing on Citibank and trying to limit disruption for regulars. It hasn’t even happened yet, but you and others here are already shitting on it. That’s the issue I have with the criticisms here.

        • Optional
          link
          -26 months ago

          Oh, sorry, no didn’t mean to shit on a specific thing, just saying there’s good ways to do it and bad ways to do it and some of the sort-of recent ones were obviously bad.