I don’t know about you, but I don’t keep acrylamide, azodicarbonamide, sodium acid pyrophosphate, dimethylpolysiloxane, or tertiary butylhydroquinone in my kitchen.
That’s a good question. You should consider substantiating your dismissal of concern with a verified toxicology report. Until then, my initial claim of being “laden with chemical treatments” stands as accurate, as supported by a credible source.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t keep acrylamide, azodicarbonamide, sodium acid pyrophosphate, dimethylpolysiloxane, or tertiary butylhydroquinone in my kitchen.
https://organicconsumers.org/top-10-toxic-ingredients-used-mcdonalds/
They also continue to use PFAS in their food packaging, expecting to phase them out by the end of next year.
https://retailerreportcard.com/retailer/mcdonalds/
Unless you have a source that lists exact quantities Mcdonalds uses and at what quantity it’s toxic calling anything “toxic” is meaningless.
My digestive, cardiac, and nervous systems don’t seem to care about the law very much. Lol
Toxicologists study human health not law…
Are you citing a toxicological review? Your comment read to me like a case argument.
You know exactly what I said.
“X has toxic chemicals”
How much chemicals? Because toxicity is a result of a dosage.
That’s a good question. You should consider substantiating your dismissal of concern with a verified toxicology report. Until then, my initial claim of being “laden with chemical treatments” stands as accurate, as supported by a credible source.