@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agoProtonsmander.xyzimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1711arrow-down119
arrow-up1692arrow-down1imageProtonsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareAnIndefiniteArticlelinkfedilinkEnglish-15•6 months agoInaccurate format, mischaracterizes Cosmo and Wanda.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish27•6 months agoMaybe, but I deciped OP as the chad and you as the soy in my mind so your argument is invalid
minus-square@FireTowerlinkEnglish21•6 months agoIt’s a pretty on point parody of their characters. Wanda being the responsible voice of reason. Cosmo being the fun one.
minus-squareAnIndefiniteArticlelinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoSpecifically that characterization is what I see as inaccurate. Wanda was wacky and irresponsible, too. Cosmo was just more of a ditz about it.
Inaccurate format, mischaracterizes Cosmo and Wanda.
Maybe, but I deciped OP as the chad and you as the soy in my mind so your argument is invalid
It’s a pretty on point parody of their characters. Wanda being the responsible voice of reason. Cosmo being the fun one.
Specifically that characterization is what I see as inaccurate. Wanda was wacky and irresponsible, too. Cosmo was just more of a ditz about it.
YOU MEAN TO SAY THIS IS NOT CANON???!