I’ll reserve judgment until I find more information. It could be a good thing, Wikipedia does have problems with editors changing articles, or it could be a bad thing to proliferate misinformation. That’s why I linked the Reuters article.
Edit: I read through the page on Fascism. It’s crap, runaway.
Someone already showed that the linked article was outdated nonsense almost the minute it was published.
But if you want more, take a look at the pictures at the top of their page on fascism, note the non-fascists in the picture and the conspicuous absence of Francisco Franco.
I care about the facts and the truth, not the source, as should you.
But I notice you ignored all the left-wing sources I provided that demonstrates the new areas in China are populated and not “ghost cities,” so I’m guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.
Yes. “Biases.”
https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/zbfmvr/justapedia_a_farright_fork_of_the_englishlanguage/
I was reading about it too.
But hey, Elon Musk and writers at Quillette like it, so there’s that.
I’ll reserve judgment until I find more information. It could be a good thing, Wikipedia does have problems with editors changing articles, or it could be a bad thing to proliferate misinformation. That’s why I linked the Reuters article.
Edit: I read through the page on Fascism. It’s crap, runaway.
Someone already showed that the linked article was outdated nonsense almost the minute it was published.
But if you want more, take a look at the pictures at the top of their page on fascism, note the non-fascists in the picture and the conspicuous absence of Francisco Franco.
https://justapedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Edit: Furthermore- https://x.com/JustapediaF/status/1757941868778700982
Where? Everything I’m reading says that most of the new state-level areas are inhabited and not “ghost cities.” Unless Ohio State is wrong.
It’s really not hard to go through a conversation chain.
https://lemmy.world/comment/10300436
But I notice you ignored all the stuff about the source being far right, so I’m guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.
I care about the facts and the truth, not the source, as should you.
But I notice you ignored all the left-wing sources I provided that demonstrates the new areas in China are populated and not “ghost cities,” so I’m guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.
This is what you said which started this conversation:
I showed you that the whole thing is about Wikipedia not having a right-wing bias.
I thought you cared about facts and truth?
I do. I admitted Justapedia was a biased source:
but the references linked were credible.
I’ll admit when I’m wrong, will you?
When did I say Wikipedia didn’t have a bias? Please quote me.
Again, if you care about the truth, you’ll show where I made that claim that you think you’re refuting.