@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agoHeromander.xyzimagemessage-square179fedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down125cross-posted to: chonglangtv
arrow-up11.28Karrow-down1imageHeromander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square179fedilinkcross-posted to: chonglangtv
minus-squareOptionallinkEnglish-3•6 months agoSo if I ask you to define what a human is, you’re not going to draw at all from any previous scientific studies? I doubt it. Not to get too ontological, just saying science (biology, psychology, anthropology) very much do define what human is.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoFor a lot of people, I would think that the answer to “what is a human?” Would be closer to religious and philosophical definitions than scientific ones.
So if I ask you to define what a human is, you’re not going to draw at all from any previous scientific studies?
I doubt it. Not to get too ontological, just saying science (biology, psychology, anthropology) very much do define what human is.
For a lot of people, I would think that the answer to “what is a human?” Would be closer to religious and philosophical definitions than scientific ones.