A career State Department official resigned from her post on Tuesday, saying she could no longer work for the Biden administration after it released a report concluding that Israel was not preventing the flow of aid to Gaza.

Stacy Gilbert, who served as a senior civilian-military advisor to the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM), sent an email to staff saying she was resigning because she felt the State Department had made the wrong assessment, The Washington Post reported, citing officials who read the note.

The report was filed in response to President Joe Biden issuing a national security memorandum (NSM-20) in early February on whether the administration finds credible Israel’s assurances that its use of US weapons do not violate either American or international law.

The report said there were reasonable grounds to believe Israel on several occasions had used American-supplied weapons “inconsistent” with international humanitarian law, but said it could not make a definitive assessment - enough to prevent the suspension of arms transfers.

  • @blazera
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    In the last 47 years Independent Parties have received a combined total of 0% of the electoral votes.

    And thats going so well for us as we get to choose between Joe “Im a Zionist” who uses emergency powers to bypass congress to fast track weapons to Israel to commit genocide, and Trump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Lmao

      Yes, to reiterate this for you one more time, we’re choosing between Joe “Don’t Cross this Line for Real this Time” Biden and Donald “Nuke the Region” Trump. You contribute more to death and destruction by voting third party than for Biden. These are your choices.

      I don’t like it. I don’t expect you to like it. But this is it.

      • @blazera
        link
        English
        17 months ago

        Alright if I can only possibly choose between Trump or Biden on the ballot in November you shouldnt have anything to worry about me choosing someone else whose name is gonna be on the ballot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          The USA allows write-ins and third parties on the ballot, but as I mentioned 0% of the Electoral Vote in 47 years makes it sort of pointless. If you really don’t like either voting for candidate then I have some good news: both parties want Election Reform. DNC is for campaign finance and popular vote winners while RNC is for ending elections.

          • @blazera
            link
            English
            07 months ago

            DNC is for campaign finance

            No theyre not, theyre as bribed as republicans. Makes all that noise making about trump soliciting campaign funds from oil executives ring hollow.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Oh I’m sorry, I guess H.R. 1 For the People Act was just complete lies start to finish. It’s a good thing Republicans didn’t call them out on their bluffs or it would have exposed them all as frauds, huh?

              • @blazera
                link
                English
                07 months ago

                I dont see anything in it about reducing the bribes they receive.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  That’s because that was already illegal. What the bill blocked was Campaign Financing by megadonors and foreign nationals.

                  https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1/text

                  DIVISION B—Campaign Finance

                  TITLE IV—Campaign Finance Transparency - Mainly talks about disclosure of foreign entity funds and corporations based outside of the USA or with any such affiliations.

                  TITLE V—Campaign Finance Empowerment - The US Citizen specific rules, and in fact it STARTS this title with an overturning of Citizens United SCOTUS decision.

                  • @blazera
                    link
                    English
                    -17 months ago

                    Its legal. It does nothing to reduce bribes from megadonors. It doesnt overturn citizens united, it just criticizes it.