• @njm1314
    link
    56 months ago

    The first one it should be pointed out was not the Nobel Prize data. It was from a separate project. I’ve never seen a single article about about that in which that’s not the first paragraph by the way so I can’t believe you missed it.

    Every other thing you’ve listed is not a matter of falsifying data. I mean I’m not going to comment on the economics and literature ones cuz that’s clearly is nothing to do what we’re talking about, and discussions about people’s political beliefs and whether or not more people should have been credited for them about prize is again nothing to do with the data.

    I am pleased that you kept it to Winners though, since that was very clearly the criteria of our discussion. And as we pointed out here all these prizes are very heavily vetted.