• @SuperIce
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    The US would also like to not get nuked by Putin, which is why they haven’t directly entered the war.

    • @Eatspancakes84
      link
      27 months ago

      This is such a weird restriction. Vietnam was a proxy war between the US and the Soviets, and both had boots on the ground. Nobody was particularly concerned this would cause WW3. Why is Ukraine different? Of course, I am not advocating a fully armed confrontation, but Western elite troops that can mark targets, take out key operatives, and direct troops? I don’t see the issue.

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        US weapons weren’t landing on strategic Russian assets inside territory that Russia claimed as it’s own. That’s why no one was overly concerned about nuclear escalation or WW III.

        • @Eatspancakes84
          link
          27 months ago

          Here I am talking about Western troops that would be active in Ukraine, not Russia.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      English
      27 months ago

      If the state of Russia’s nuclear arsenal is anything like the rest of their military the US really doesn’t have much to worry about.

      • @Red_October
        link
        -27 months ago

        So if MOST of their nuclear weapons don’t work, how many nukes hitting the US would you say is okay? Because while it’s pretty safe to assume some, maybe even many of their nukes don’t function properly, it’s a bit much to assume none of them work, and it’s a bit much to gamble a few million lives on the idea that none of the ones that do work will actually get through.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Or that the world would be hurt even if all of them fail before reaching their targets, or even failing in the silos (best case).

          We have enough cancerous shit in our environment as it is.