• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 months ago

    My comment had nothing to do with the article.

    You were talking about how we (me and the top level commentor) were both fair in our assumption about what kind of person was that was willing to undergo the procedure. And the article is about people willing to undergo the procedure. So you were absolutely talking about the article. Not only that, but incorrectly claiming that my position was based on being equally as ignorant as you and the top level commentor, when my position was actually based on being knowledgeable by reading the comment.

    • @atrielienz
      link
      English
      16 months ago

      Because you both made assumptions. Just because your assumptions were not about the article itself doesn’t mean that you didn’t make assumptions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        The assumption you claimed I made was in relation to a fact I stated that’s in the article. Wtf are you on about, specifically?

        • @atrielienz
          link
          English
          16 months ago

          No. The assumption was that the other person had the context you had from the article, and chose to call someone stupid. But I don’t know why you’re even bothering with this. You obviously don’t agree and that’s fine.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            You’re attempting to change what you accused me of assuming. But in your attempt to be not wrong, you made yourself even more wrong.

            I made no assumption that they read the article. I was actually pretty sure they didn’t, in typical Lemmy fashion.

            So it’s not actually you assuming. Lol

            And why do you keep on acting like I’m the only one keeping this conversation going? You’ve responded to me as much as I’ve responded to you.