@Rainb0wSkeppy to [email protected]English • 4 months agoif this post gets 64 upvotes, i will post again with twice as wide en passantimagemessage-square26arrow-up1531arrow-down177
arrow-up1454arrow-down1imageif this post gets 64 upvotes, i will post again with twice as wide en passant@Rainb0wSkeppy to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square26
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•4 months agoI thought we established last time thst it was fancier to put all of the emphasis on the en and entirely gloss over, barely mumbling passant. eeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnpassant
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•4 months agoI’m willing to negotiate for multiple ens as separate words, but multiple ns in a single en makes no sense at all. I’m adding 64 passes, which is physically meaningful. It’s important we stay grounded in reality here.
minus-square@Dayroom7485link1•4 months ago+1 for actually counting the passes. It’s hard work, but someone has to do it, goddammit!
I thought we established last time thst it was fancier to put all of the emphasis on the en and entirely gloss over, barely mumbling passant.
eeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnpassant
I’m willing to negotiate for multiple ens as separate words, but multiple ns in a single en makes no sense at all. I’m adding 64 passes, which is physically meaningful. It’s important we stay grounded in reality here.
+1 for actually counting the passes. It’s hard work, but someone has to do it, goddammit!
Let me demonstrate: eeeennnnnn