• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    486 months ago

    That’s like saying state secrets are protected under the 1st lol

    I don’t think it’s true

      • @Bernie_Sandals
        link
        175 months ago

        While courts have ruled source code is first amendment protected. Your statement is still very very wrong. Just because it’s first amendment protected doesn’t mean it can’t be classified normally or made illegal to leak because of ITAR.

        But go leak some of the source code from XKeyscore or a schematic of a pair of GPNVG if you’d like to test our code classification and ITAR systems.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -35 months ago

          I’m not taking about sealing some government secrets. I’m taking about building a fun hobby project with some sort of targeting system. Think a small rocket that drops a payload or a water balloon launcher.

          • @Bernie_Sandals
            link
            65 months ago

            Okay but that has no relevance at all to what the comment you were replying to was about. Companies contracted by the government and DOD specifically to create rockets are guaranteed to be covered by ITAR. Meaning open sourcing them would be impossible, regardless of the first amendment or anything else.

            There’s a massive massive difference between the software for a DOD contracted rocket like SpaceX makes, and hobbyist rocketry.

              • @Bernie_Sandals
                link
                25 months ago

                Why do you think software would be treated any differently?

                  • @Bernie_Sandals
                    link
                    3
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Okay but again as has been pointed out to you, that has no bearing on government contracted products like this, whether that’s code or rockets or anything else the government doesn’t want to just share with the entire world.