• HonkyTonkWoman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Dave? No, just someone who’s willing to give a band I like the benefit of the doubt over penis shaped billionaire.

      Good luck changing the world by turning your back on the things that make you happy!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Thanks dude.

        I appreciate you being supportive of me choosing to spend my time and money as I please, something I support of you too.

        FYI - I am very happy, I spent the day with family today, put a deposit on a new tattoo and treated myself to a lovely Seiko. I’m now listening to some Chopin and waiting for food.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            Nice. I’d love to get down to some National Trails.

            Huh… interesting revelation about Chopin, I was aware Wagner was pretty anti-Semitic.

            As for not listening to Chopin, I think I can be pretty sure that he isn’t making any money from me listening to him, the same as listening I my FF CDs. I thought I had been pretty clear on that for this entire thread that I would not be rewarding them with money or time on services that give them money.

            • HonkyTonkWoman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You did make that clear. But you haven’t stated why, other than Amazon Money = Bad.

              There aren’t enough good musicians getting paid what they should be on this planet. And most of the ones who are making shit tons of money in music, don’t deserve it.

              You, at one point in time, thought the Foo Fighters deserved to be making big money in the music industry, otherwise you wouldn’t have listened to them.

              So now that the Foo Fighters have made it big enough that Billionaires want private concerts from them, your response is to abandon them.

              You still have no idea whether they needed the money or plan to do something positive with it, you just know they took it from Amazon and you don’t like it.

              That’s some fair weather fandom right there.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                The Foo Fighters have enough money that there kids kids won’t have to work again.

                The why is because I don’t support Amazon and in turn people that do support Amazon.

                I don’t agree that too many artists are making money that don’t deserve it. If people are buying there music, whether I think their music is vapid or not doesn’t matter. If you are a pop star and have millions of fans then they’ve earned it imo.

                As a software developer I could earn double my current wage working for a gambling company, but I don’t support that and so I think any artist I support should have the same kind of morals.

                • HonkyTonkWoman
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  You keep saying that about gambling, like it equates to the Foo Fighters taking money from Amazon, but it doesn’t.

                  The foo fighters didn’t accept a sponsorship from Amazon, you’re not going to see smile logos on their instruments or expect their road crew to wear those blue uniforms.

                  They took a high paying gig.

                  Furthermore, until you can produce a balance sheet, your statement about the Foo Fighters wealth is conjecture.

                  You do not know where that band stands financially after losing a founding member’s death & on the heels of a pandemic.

                  You don’t know how much money the band lost having to cancel their tour after Taylor passed. You have no idea whether their insurance premiums went up.

                  There are whole slew of logistical factors that could’ve made it an easier decision on the band to take the gig, but you won’t consider any other possibility, will you? You’ve jumped right to the conclusion that your heroes turned greedy & took some money you don’t like, & you’re certain enough of that stance that after one article, you’re willing to abandon them.

                  The majority of all musicians operate at deficit & are not rolling around in the black. Where’s your proof the Foo Fighters are?

                  I don’t know either, but I at least have the presence of mind not to publicly shit on them until more information comes out.

                  Furthermore Furthermore, name a band who you follow that is not touched by Amazon? A band that’s not on Amazon Music, that has no physical media or merch for sale via Amazon. A band that doesn’t perform at any Amazon sponsored venues or Amazon sponsored concert series.

                  And if you’re not willing to do that, just tell me who should have received that money, if not the Foo Fighters?

                  You want to take a stand, fine, but don’t pretend your little personal boycott is anything other than a self serving pat on the back.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    26 months ago

                    Where’s the line for you then?

                    Would you support the Foo Fighters playing a concert at anti LGBTQ+ rallies?

                    Would you support the Foo Fighters playing a concert Neo-Nazis?

                    Would you support the Foo Fighters playing a concert for the IDF?