@alphanerd4M to US Authoritarianism • 5 months agoThe Crux of the Isssueimagemessage-square114arrow-up1586arrow-down119
arrow-up1567arrow-down1imageThe Crux of the Isssue@alphanerd4M to US Authoritarianism • 5 months agomessage-square114
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link1•5 months agoit’s wrong to say that they can win but only if you don’t vote for them. it makes no sense at all.
minus-square@Cryophilialink0•5 months agoWhat? No it’s just mathematically impossible for them to win.
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link1•5 months agoit’s impossible to win… if people don’t vote for you.
minus-square@Cryophilialink1•5 months agoEven if they do, still can’t win. Do you not know how first past the post voting works?
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link1•5 months agothe only way any candidate wins is people voting for them
minus-square@Cryophilialink1•5 months agoI ask again, do you know how first past the post voting works?
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link1•5 months agoit’s not a magic phrase that makes it possible for someone to win without getting votes.
it’s wrong to say that they can win but only if you don’t vote for them. it makes no sense at all.
What? No it’s just mathematically impossible for them to win.
it’s impossible to win… if people don’t vote for you.
Even if they do, still can’t win. Do you not know how first past the post voting works?
the only way any candidate wins is people voting for them
I ask again, do you know how first past the post voting works?
it’s not a magic phrase that makes it possible for someone to win without getting votes.
So, no.