A global shortage of oranges that sent prices soaring has prompted some orange juice manufacturers to consider turning to alternative fruits to make the breakfast staple.

“There are three main factors driving the soaring price of orange juice, and it’s drought, disease and demand,” Ted Jenkin, oXYGen Financial CEO and co-founder, told FOX Business.

The spike stems from declining output in Florida, which is the primary U.S. producer, and disease and extreme weather events in Brazil, which accounts for about 70% of global production.

Orange trees in Brazil have been suffering from a disease known as citrus greening. Once infected, citrus trees produce fruits that are partially green, small, misshapen and bitter. There is no cure, and trees typically die within a few years of infection.

The disease, along with severe heat waves and drought that occurred during the pivotal phases of flowering and early fruit formation, have put Brazil on track to register one of its worst orange harvests in more than three decades, according to a new report published by Fundecitrus and CitrusBR.

In the past, orange juice makers have avoided long-term shortages by freezing juice stock, which can be preserved and used for up to two years, according to the Financial Times. However, even that frozen stock is dissipating because of a three-year shortage build-up.

Cools said that manufacturers may have to consider using a different fruit, like mandarins, because their trees are more resistant to the greening disease. However, that could be a lengthy process.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -16
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There is no cure, and trees typically die within a few years of infection.

    Molecular biologists could make tree that won’t get infected. Until ecoactivists like Greenpeace will come and uproot the trees.

    • @pivot_root
      link
      English
      217 months ago

      Has the disease been researched well enough for us to know how to genetically engineer resistance to it? If not, what you’re saying is a moot point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Considering article about it on wikipedia was created in 2005 and says it appeared in USSA in 1998, it should have been researched.

        Also quick look at Control section suggets that it is well-researched already.

        Humanity already researched so many diseases, that biggest problem to research new one is paywall

        • @pivot_root
          link
          English
          127 months ago

          In that case, then yup. Fuck both the corporations patenting/paywalling these advancements and the anti-GMO crowd fear mongering about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            When there will be catgirls?! Yes, GMO crops would allow to use less resources(land, water and stuff crops eat) to feed same amount of people.

            Fuck both the corporations patenting

            It’s worse than most think. You can go and patent spider silk protein. Not that you invented it, but for no reason it’s patentable and such patents already exist. Literally patenting nature. Oh, also regular crops can be patented too for some reason, no gene engieneering required.

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It took centuries to come up with the smallpox vaccine. None of the control methods have available genetically-engineered trees. They can only substantially decrease rate of infection, but that’s nowhere close to 90%.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It took centuries to come up with the smallpox vaccine.

            Smallpox? Why thousands? You could say millions of years, you could say billions. Just don’t go over 14 billions, it would be complete nonsense.

            Smallpox vaccine is first vaccine ever made. Second vaccine took another while to be developed. Then they started to be created much more often. In current age developing vaccine for new virus(example) takes…

            - December 2019 - first recorded case

            - May 2020 - announcement of start of development

            - August 2020 - studies ended

            - September 2020 - studies published

            Obviously you can find vaccine that was developed faster.

            But since we are talking about genetically engieneering trees, here’s example. There is fungus that threats to make Cavendish banana and first was found in 90-ies, and I found article from 2023 about Australia approving export of engieneered bananas.

            Now back to CVPD. Since how CVPD works is described in Did we both miss “Antisense oligonucleotides” subsection? Exact modifications are already known. Just insert them into tree.

            EDIT: typos

            EDIT2: export of modified bananas, not fungus. Lol.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              Just don’t go over 14 billions, it would be complete nonsense.

              Actually, the more data we get from JWST, the more evidence we get that the universe is older than 14 billion years. Some estimates have it in the 25 - 30 billion year range.

    • @RBWells
      link
      English
      17 months ago

      There are greening tolerant (not resistant) varieties developed already, yes of course biologists have been and are urgently working on it. I have a “sugar bell” tree, that’s one of them.