• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -224 days ago

    Which, Imo, is a good thing. Having a human repossess a vehicle is a pretty dangerous situation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          The lack of a soul and the class treason?

          /Joke

          Kinda

          Stupid moral requirement to acknowledge “universal” human rights

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            323 days ago

            I mean, a car isn’t a universal human right.

            If you financed a car, that means the lender owns it until you pay it off. You agree in the loan contract that they’ll take it back if you stop paying for it.

            Plus, it’s not like they repo it the day after a missed payment.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -1
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              That’s fair, because obviously the loan company also reimburses you the lost equity, right?

              No?

              They steal that? Or, rather, sell it for a fraction of the real value and then demand a total repayment of the loan anyways?

              I mean, you’d think they just take the collateral, correct? That’s the point of collateral.

              But that’s okay, because they’re the ones assuming all the risk in the situation, right?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                223 days ago

                Most car loans are upside-down the second you drive it off the lot. It takes a long time to get out of negative equity, so the vast majority of people who have their cars repossessed don’t have any equity built up.