Microsoft has Copilot Plus PCs loaded with AI, and rumors are that Apple is all in on AI, too, but if you don't want AI in everything you do, there is another option: Linux.
Ehh, I have a different vision here - AI is useful, it’s just going down the hypermonetisation path at the moment. It’s not great because your data is being scraped and used to fuel paywalled content - that is largely why most folks object.
It’s, also, badly implemented, and is draining a lot of system resource when plugged into an OS for little more than a showy web search.
Eventually, after a suitable lag, we’ll see Linux AI as the AI we always wanted. A local, reasonable resource intense, option.
The real game changer will be a shift towards custom hardware for AIs (they’re just huge probability models with a lot of repetitive similar calculations). At the moment, we use GPUs as they’re the best option for these calculations. As the specialist hardware is developed, and gets cheaper, we’ll see more local models and thus more Linux AI goodness.
Eh, AI is over hyped imo, and I’m not particularly interested in running it at all. But local models do exist, and I hear they’re pretty decent, so Linux users can get most of what they want today.
Linux shouldn’t brand itself as anti-AI, and it really shouldn’t brand itself as anti-anything, it should brand itself as being pro-user. If you want AI, Linux can handle that, and if you don’t, Linux doesn’t force it. It’s the option for user choice. Oh, and if you don’t want choice and just want it to work, there’s a distro for that.
Ehh, I have a different vision here - AI is useful, it’s just going down the hypermonetisation path at the moment. It’s not great because your data is being scraped and used to fuel paywalled content - that is largely why most folks object.
It’s, also, badly implemented, and is draining a lot of system resource when plugged into an OS for little more than a showy web search.
Eventually, after a suitable lag, we’ll see Linux AI as the AI we always wanted. A local, reasonable resource intense, option.
The real game changer will be a shift towards custom hardware for AIs (they’re just huge probability models with a lot of repetitive similar calculations). At the moment, we use GPUs as they’re the best option for these calculations. As the specialist hardware is developed, and gets cheaper, we’ll see more local models and thus more Linux AI goodness.
Eh, AI is over hyped imo, and I’m not particularly interested in running it at all. But local models do exist, and I hear they’re pretty decent, so Linux users can get most of what they want today.
Linux shouldn’t brand itself as anti-AI, and it really shouldn’t brand itself as anti-anything, it should brand itself as being pro-user. If you want AI, Linux can handle that, and if you don’t, Linux doesn’t force it. It’s the option for user choice. Oh, and if you don’t want choice and just want it to work, there’s a distro for that.