• @CaptainSpaceman
    link
    -24 months ago

    It means anyone picking a “side” in the US vs Tiktok debate should reconsider their position (imo anyways)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      I didn’t pick aside. I don’t use TikTok and I don’t care who owns it. But I live in the US, theoretically I would rather one entity spying on me than two lol

      • @CaptainSpaceman
        link
        -14 months ago

        Why not zero? Aim higher fam, people let themselves be surveilled too easily these days without any resistance

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If I don’t want to be spied on by the US I would have to leave the country, which is not exactly an option. Then I would have to determine a country that does not spy on its citizens or is otherwise not spied on heavily by another country. I’d be very curious with that list looks like. I imagine it’s very small, and very undesirable.

          I use a lot of digital tools to protect my privacy and have fought for digital privacy rights directly. Don’t lecture me please.

          Where is this magical land you live?

          Honestly I’m just getting tired of discussions where people lecture me about “just taking it laying down“ as if somehow I have the ability to end the US surveillance state or otherwise opt out of it. I have limited options, as do all of us. I am acknowledging reality, not saying I endorse it or don’t even push back where I can. These kinds of comments are flippant and annoying.

          TL;DR: zero isn’t a real option today so don’t act like it is.

          • @CaptainSpaceman
            link
            14 months ago

            Ofc zero is an option, we just have to have the conversion to start the process