Local Colorado officials have reached an $8.5 million settlement with a woman who was hospitalized in 2022 after being left handcuffed in a police SUV that was then hit by a train.

The city of Fort Lupton and town of Platteville, Colorado, agreed on the settlement with the victim, Yareni Rios-Gonzalez, according to a release from the Fort Lupton Police Department. The settlement amount will be split equally between the town and city and paid by their insurers, according to attorney Eric M. Ziporin, whose office represents the city.

Rios, who was a suspect in a road rage case, survived the September 2022 collision but suffered nine broken ribs, a broken arm and other injuries.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    406 months ago

    Police aren’t civilians and they aren’t workers. Abolish their “union” as well as Qualified Immunity. They can earn the right to not be prosecuted while doing their job…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Police are supposed to be civilians. The whole idea of America avoiding mitary dictatorship was vested in the Army being under the control of the Commander in Chief (a civilian chosen by civilians), In conjunction with the police force being comprised of civilians, otherwise that force is just a military with a different name. You can make the argument they’re above civilians in current times but this is by no mean integral to american policing, and is in fact antithetical to the American idea of police.

      Don’t get me wrong I still think they’re problematic even in the theoretical best case scenario, but they’re definitely civilians. Know you enemy, know them well.

      • @Wrench
        link
        46 months ago

        I’m not an expert on the origins of police in the US, but I thought their origin story was basically to oppress the civilian population to protect corporate property.

        Like, their entire purpose and why they were given authority was so that they could beat down civilians in the name of corporate profits. Which is the opposite of what you’re claiming.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          How are those contradictory? Can a civilian force not shakedown people to protect property?

          Or are you asking me why they made a theoretical safety on the idea of policing instead of just telling everyone ‘Hey these are going to be our new chosen opressors, have fun!’

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            How are those contradictory? Can a civilian force not shakedown people to protect property?

            I think the idea is that civilian force has governmental protections that other civilians would otherwise never have.

    • @disguy_ovahea
      link
      86 months ago

      Or take settlement money out of police pension funds.

    • @Dkarma
      link
      76 months ago

      Police absolutely ARE CIVILIANS

      • @orclev
        link
        196 months ago

        The problem is police aren’t treated like civilians.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Oxford Languages definition:

        civilian:

        noun

        a person not in the armed services or the police force.

        I’m obviously using the term in a non-military context as the topic is policing, not military or international conflict.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -36 months ago

          Where’s Oxford again? American policing is based on the fact that a civilian force polices a civilian body. Its part of the tools to avoid military dictatorship, the same way the President is a civilian chosen by the people to be the Commander in Chief of the military.

          • @ripcord
            link
            46 months ago

            Marriam-webster:

            1. one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force
            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -3
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Cool now tell me what common parlance has to do with the legal classification of police officers? (Hint: legally cops are civilians and dictionaries dont supercede the law)

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  The argument was always that cops are civilians, no posts have been moved, you just realized you’re wrong and a definition from a non legal document doesn’t mean jack shit when it comes to government classification.

      • @A_Random_Idiot
        link
        English
        56 months ago

        Civilians don’t get free passes on murder, torture, intimidation, false evidence, etc etc etc.

    • Thassodar
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      So many people are anti-union but when it comes to the police union they’re oddly silent…

    • @Stamau123
      link
      26 months ago

      Cops don’t have qualified immunity in Colorado