@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agoStudy finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square136fedilinkarrow-up1431arrow-down126starcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock usercross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1405arrow-down1external-linkStudy finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square136fedilinkstarcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock usercross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-24 months agoIf 2 and 3 happen the game is up. Management killed it. That’s not agiles fault. arrow-up112arrow-down13file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•4 months agoSurely you’re not gonna blame the manager… /s arrow-up15arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•4 months agoBut that’s what agile sounds like to management. They don’t understand the “it’s held together by hopes and dreams” communication, because all they see is something that appears to work. So why would they invest anything else in it. arrow-up11arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
If 2 and 3 happen the game is up. Management killed it.
That’s not agiles fault.
Surely you’re not gonna blame the manager… /s
But that’s what agile sounds like to management. They don’t understand the “it’s held together by hopes and dreams” communication, because all they see is something that appears to work. So why would they invest anything else in it.