I don’t tend to eat much fish, but in the supermarket earlier I saw some smoked salmon which didn’t need cooking, and some salmon fillets which did. They looked the same really - both ‘raw’. I decided to buy some of the fillet. It was nice, but a very different flavour from when I’ve tried smoked salmon in the past. The cooked fillet was quite chicken-y with a slight earthy/fishy taste, whereas smoked salmon has a very strong fish flavour.

Why do they taste so different? And why is smoked salmon safe to eat without cooking when other smoked fish do need cooking?

  • @TheYear2525
    link
    English
    531 year ago

    Low heat for long time = safe

    High heat for short time = safe

    High heat breaks down more compounds in meat and makes colors change

    • @DireLlama
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      This really shouldn’t be the top rated comment. Cold smoked salmon is smoked at 15-25°C for about half a day. If temperature were the key, you would achieve the same effect by just placing it on the countertop overnight.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I didn’t realise how complex this was! So with hot smoked salmon, the temperature is hot enough to kill bacteria but not denature the protein (so it still looks ‘raw’). Cold smoked doesn’t cook the fish but imparts the smoky flavour, and it’s made safe to eat by other preservation methods? (as per @[email protected]’s comment)

        • Margot Robbie
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          Well, smoking is a wide variety of processes and very food dependent, but hot smoked food is usually cooked. For example, if you buy Alaskan smoked salmon, they look cooked and a bit jerky like; similarly, for Texas style smoked briskets, the meat is cooked slowly over a couple of hours inside a smoker.

          Maybe it would be easier to watch a video on cold smoked salmon to see how the process works.

        • @DireLlama
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, @[email protected] is correct (sorry, I haven’t figured out yet how to link usernames). Hot smoked food usually doesn’t keep for more than a few days, if that, because it is cooked. AFAIK, in cold smoking, the smoke itself even has a preserving effect because it kills surface bacteria and dehydrates the outer crust, but the fish is also salted or brined. As noted in other comments, there are a wide variety of different techniques. Note: I’m not an expert, so I may be off on the details. I just used to work next door to a smokery and chatted with the owners sometimes.

          • Margot Robbie
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Oh don’t worry, you did it right!

    • Alexmitter
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      It’s salmon, you can eat that thing raw if you like, like beef too, just that with salmon you have to fully freeze it once to kill potential parasite worms.

      • @TheYear2525
        link
        English
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Safe is a spectrum, I suppose. I eat rare beef and runny eggs, but there’s always a safety warning at the bottom of the menu. Still, the level of “safe” is a function of both temperature and time, at least according to the USDA.

        • Alexmitter
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Runny eggs are normal eggs I think, who boils them to the full hardness?
          I mean sure it’s raw beef, bacteria will love it but as long as it’s fresh and well handled it can totally be eaten raw, unlike pork or chicken for example. I don’t mean rare, I mean raw, fully uncooked. Steak Tartar or carpaccio for example, two absolutely delicious meals.

          • no banana
            link
            81 year ago

            According to my experience most people do like their eggs hardboiled. Personally I hate it, but I always have to specify and then I get hardboiled anyway.

          • @TheYear2525
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Your and my threshold for acceptable risk seems to be similar. But we’re taking a risk. If you graph that risk, it lowers predictably based on time cooked, and the rate at which it lowers increases at higher temperatures. That was my only point, and I’m not sure if you’re disagreeing or just providing anecdotes and your preferences.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            as long as it’s fresh and well handled it can totally be eaten raw, unlike pork or chicken for example.

            Even those can be eaten raw in the right circumstances. Just ask a German for Mettbrötchen

    • @fidodo
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That doesn’t apply if the temperature is below what’s needed to kill bacteria and cold smoked salmon is smoked at temperatures too low to kill bacteria. Smoking inhibits bacteria growth a bit, but it’s mostly the curing that does it, and neither kill bacteria, it just slows it and allows healthy bacteria to take hold.

      There’s also hot smoked salmon which is low and slow and above kill temp, but that has a much more cooked texture so op is probably talking about cold smoking. Cold smoking is riskier to do at home for these reasons and store cold smoked salmon is carefully controlled.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      So how does low heat kill bacteria and make it safe? Why do people generally cook smoked haddock but not smoked salmon - different bacteria?

      • @TheYear2525
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        The same ways extreme temperatures would kill you faster the more extreme they are.

        I don’t know about the difference between those two fish, but I suspect it’s more to do with texture and flavor than safety.