• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -117 months ago

    Sounds like you should install double what you think you need. Reason? The panels will start losing efficiency over time and your electricity usage over time will do nothing but grow. That’s very common.

    • @Valmond
      link
      English
      67 months ago

      Dude.

      Those panels lost only 20%, so far from half, in 32 years.

      That’s impressive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -67 months ago

        I didn’t say they lost half but they lost 20% so you need to have at least 120% today and then you need to account for the fact that you will get more electric devices in the future. How are you going to charge your electric car if you don’t have the electric to do it? So therefore you should probably double it.

        • @bc93
          link
          English
          37 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -27 months ago

            Sure, the usage hasn’t changed on average in about 20 years, but in the next 20 years, it’s definitely going to increase dramatically.

            • PrivateNoob
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              Curious, which of our equipment will need more energy? Do you mean electric vehicles?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                Yes, if the vast majority of cars are going to be electric in 20 years, you are definitely going to need a lot more power in order to charge them.

                • @Kodiack
                  link
                  English
                  27 months ago

                  Then let’s get some vehicle-to-grid adoption going and make EVs a net benefit for spreading load better.