@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 9 months agoApple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'www.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1284arrow-down116
arrow-up1268arrow-down1external-linkApple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'www.engadget.com@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-square@slurpinderpinlinkEnglish-12•9 months agoWe’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?
minus-squareParadoxlinkfedilinkEnglish20•9 months agoGoogle has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•9 months agoGoogle does on the Pixel line, at least for pictures (and probably more).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•9 months agoI mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.
minus-square@slurpinderpinlinkEnglish7•9 months agoOk, so either way, there’s innovation no? I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoI dunno if ‘Siri but functional’ is good enough to get points from me. That said this is definitely good for the industry
We’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?
Google has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3
Google does on the Pixel line, at least for pictures (and probably more).
I mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.
Ok, so either way, there’s innovation no?
I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here
I dunno if ‘Siri but functional’ is good enough to get points from me. That said this is definitely good for the industry