• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Except it does seem rather odd to keep a medicine from people whose lives it could save (obesity causes a lot more problems than diabetes), because someone somewhere might try to abuse it. Frankly, if you want to voluntarily abuse a drug, great. My interest is in relieving the suffering caused by obesity, not protecting people from the Darwin awards.

    Imagine saying that “insulin should be expensive because some people use it for suicide and it has side-effects.”

    • @jeffwOP
      link
      15 months ago

      I didn’t think it was an abuse of the medication, I thought the comment was just discussing side effects and potential complications from regular use of it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -45 months ago

        There is a lot abuse. Wealthy people shop around for doctors to prescribe because they want to lose weight with a shot.

        • @Ensign_Crab
          link
          English
          45 months ago

          And as a result, only the wealthy should be able to afford it?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That’s not what I said. I’m saying we don’t want this being widely available and prescribed like tic tacs because people think it’ll make them look like a magazine cover. The side effects can be considerable. A doctor needs to be involved if you think you need ozempic, although sadly many are all too happy to rubber stamp it. Still, it’s being used as a shortcut by many and it’s not good for them.

        • @Serinus
          link
          45 months ago

          It’s more than a shot. It changes your appetite.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s a shot that changes your appetite (among other effects). Not sure why what I said contradicts that or implies otherwise.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -55 months ago

            Yes, and has practically no side effects. They should consider putting it in the water supply.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                05 months ago

                I just suggested putting a medicine in the water supply. Why would I be against putting a mineral in the water supply?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  05 months ago

                  Well for starters, ozempic does have common adverse side effects. So that’s one major difference.

                  • @scottywh
                    link
                    15 months ago

                    So does fluoride… It turns your teeth brown.

                    It’s just that collectively, as a society, we decided that brown teeth are better than cavity riddled teeth.

                    So the intended effect’s value outweighs the negative side effects.

                    Exactly like semaglutide.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If a doctor prescribes it for real reasons I respect that but right now it’s a celebrity weight loss “hack”

      My friend has had 3 patients walk because she won’t prescribe ozempic to them. They are not obese or have some major medical consideration. They want to use it as a substitute for a diet that they don’t even really need.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The whole prescription system is a rent-seeking scheme that enriches various middlemen, including your friend.

        How far have we fallen as a civilization that people have to meekly seek permission to take drugs? Bodily autonomy doesn’t extend to medicine, is that it? The unfathomable hypocrisy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -45 months ago

          I don’t think it’s perfect but I can’t agree with people being able to walk around buying any medication at anytime without any oversight.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            So are you a religious authoritarian or a garden variety fascist that you feel entitled to dictate to me what I can and cannot do with my body?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -45 months ago
              1. no clue how this is religious, which also I am not

              2. so you’re down for people to grab oxy off the shelf I take it?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                6
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Why not? Is addiction illegal? At most I’d say education about the medication should be more available.

                Edit obviously addiction is terrible but it’s a slippery slope to say " you can’t take this drug because of addiction risks" into “you can’t take this drug because I find it morally wrong”

      • @scottywh
        link
        55 months ago

        There are compounding pharmacies in every major city in the US who can provide generic versions of these medicines.

        They’re not going to be covered by insurance that way and they’re typically still not cheap exactly but they are cheaper than the brand names and available as an oral medication in addition to the self administered weekly shots.

        The only “shortage” has been of the proprietary injectors used by the major brand names.