Project 2025 blueprint for second Trump term envisages replacing thousands of career staff with political loyalists

America’s career diplomats are braced for the threat of a mass purge if Donald Trump wins the November election and for the potential flooding of the state department with loyalty-tested political appointees.

Rather than leading to a seamless change of course in a rightward Trumpist direction, the diplomats’ union and former ambassadors argue, such an attempted takeover would be much more likely to end in legal challenges, gridlock and chaos.

If elected, Trump has threatened to reinstate a policy he unsuccessfully attempted in his first term with the creation of “Schedule F”, a new category of federal employees which would be applied to tens of thousands of civil servants in “policy-related” jobs, robbing them of legal protections and making them liable to be fired at will.

    • @Carmakazi
      link
      265 months ago
      1. That’s why they reference the Insurrection Act. Whether the current situation meets the criteria laid out does not matter to them.
      2. It should be obvious by now that words on the books do not stop fascists. They intend to stack public institution far and deep with party loyalists so that nobody can say “no” to their will…legally, anyway.
      • @samus12345
        link
        English
        105 months ago

        I looked the Insurrection Act up. This kind of vague, old law is just the kind of thing that fascists love to leverage to install a brutal dictatorship. The GOP learned that they can do pretty much whatever they want and will get no meaningful resistance, so it would be pathetically easy for them to get rid of democracy once they have the Executive and Legislative branches again. The only saving grace is that they’re pretty incompetent at actually getting things done, but we can’t rely on that to save us again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      Generally the military and police lean into fascism so at that point I’m not sure current rules and law would stop them

      • @grue
        link
        English
        55 months ago

        “Adorable” is not the right word for it!

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          My theory is they’ll do 5-4 rulings with one of the fascists dissenting in some bizarre and really technical way over their pet issue.