• @DarkCloud
    link
    92
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yep, not voting is unironically pretty much the same as voting for the party you least want in charge.

    Because you’re making it that much more likely.

    Don’t throw away a right that your ancestors fought for, as it may result in future generations no longer having that right.

    • @GraniteM
      link
      216 months ago

      Hitler’s government was a popular government; the vast majority of Germans preferred the rule of gangsters to the effort of thinking and doing for themselves. They abdicated their franchise.

      […]

      The former Berlin businessman I referred to earlier told me that he blamed his own group, people with the time and the money and the opportunity to know better, for what happened to Germany. “We ignored Hitler,” he said. “We considered him an unimportant fellow, not quite a gentleman, not of our own class. We considered it just a little bit vulgar to bother with him, to bother with politics at all.”

      They thought of the government as “They.” The only possible route to a clear conscience in politics is to accept political responsibility, either as an active member of the party in power or as an equally active member of the loyal opposition.

      —Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

      • @grue
        link
        English
        18
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Similarly, MLK saw “the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice” as the biggest impediment to civil rights.

        The bottom line is that being secure enough in your position in society to think you don’t have to engage in politics, or that you can afford to vote your principles instead of tactically, is itself a form of privilege. Those sorts of privileged people think themselves neutral or uninvolved or maybe (in the case of professed leftists refusing to vote Dem as a protest) on their own third side, but the reality is that they are the right-wing authoritarians’ greatest ally every single time.

        • @go_go_gadget
          link
          36 months ago

          Lol imagine thinking “moderate white” doesn’t perfectly describe the majority of people walking into the 2020 primaries and voting for Joe Biden.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            26 months ago

            You’re not wrong about the primary, but you are wrong to conflate the primary with the general election when it’s the latter that we’re talking about here.

            • @go_go_gadget
              link
              -36 months ago

              Lol so I’m “radical” in the primaries when I don’t vote for Biden but I’m “moderate” in the general when I don’t vote for Biden?

              That’s not how labels work sir.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -76 months ago

          The POTUS, from the party most opposed to civil rights act, is who signed it into law, very much so a white moderate more devoted to order. So, I’m gonna take a stance and say MLK was wrong about that one if that was his take before he died.

      • @Aqarius
        link
        96 months ago

        That’s not how it went, though. It’s, in fact, the opposite of how it went. Hitler had relatively little popular support, but full support of the industrial elite. It’s blaming the people for the crimes of the elite. “They abdicated their franchise” no, fuckface, half of them voted communist. “We ignored Hitler” no, fuckface, you put him in power because you thought he’d be malleable.

        I’m not surprised Heinlein bought it, though. And I’m not surprised people here are buying it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -26 months ago

        It’s funny that both democrats and third party voters will look at your comment and think you’re on their side.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -66 months ago

      Well, mathematically it’s only half as bad.

      -1 lesser evil +1 greater evil

      Vs.

      -1 lesser evil +0 greater evil

      • @Passerby6497
        link
        English
        116 months ago

        Your math is wrong. You wouldn’t be cancelling out the greater evil with the vote for the lesser evil, so its actually twice as bad (or 4x what you were thinking).

        0 lesser evil +1 greater evil

        • @Glowstick
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Exactly.

          There is unfortunately no option to wind up with a non-evil result, your only options are greater evil result or lesser evil result.

          By voting 3rd party you didn’t reduce the chance of greater evil result, AND you didn’t increase the chance of lesser evil result.

    • @YaDownWitCPP
      link
      English
      -266 months ago

      Well, I didn’t intend on voting for Trump but, fine, you’ve convinced me.

      • @DarkCloud
        link
        296 months ago

        Hey, as long as you vote. Everyone should vote.

      • @samus12345
        link
        English
        146 months ago

        Yes, you of course weren’t already going to do that. 🙄