• @JamesTBagg
    link
    135 months ago

    You’re right but wrong about how comfortable flying used to be.
    Flying used to be heavily regulated and was heavily subsidized by air mail contracts. Aircraft were roomier and much more comfortable. After some trust and monopoly busting, and deregulation, the loss of air mail contracts, then share holders took more control.
    Then over the years prices have declined, leg room has declined, comfort has declined, passengers are now treated like sardines, being flight crew used to be a glamorous, sought-after job. We still romanticize PanAm. Now AA attendants are looking to strike because they’re making poverty wages.
    You can find stories of nightmare passengers and crews from all over the world if you look, but Americans are going to hear American news. I studied aeronautics and aviation in college. Hard to explain more from my phone while I’m pooping, but yes, flying used to be a MUCH better experience for all involved.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      35 months ago

      We still romanticize PanAm.

      Except for their 103rd flight.

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      -55 months ago

      These are decent points, but…

      being flight crew used to be a glamorous, sought-after job.

      lmao, yeah, do some research on how flight attendants were treated by the industry through the 90’s and tell me things are worse for flight crew today with a straight face.

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        95 months ago

        They’re talking about the 40s through till 1978, when we deregulated them