• @JeeBaiChow
    link
    English
    36 months ago

    If it needs supervision, why is it still called ‘full’ self driving?

    • @Nogami
      link
      English
      16 months ago

      Fucking lawyers.

    • threelonmusketeersOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Ambitious marketing. I think they’re still closer to self driving than competing systems, but “full self driving” is definitely a misleading name for what the software can currently do. We are gradually seeing more drives with zero disengagements, so the technology is slowly getting there.

      • @JeeBaiChow
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Zero disengagement is exactly what the drivers should be doing in its current state and why it shouldnt be called full self driving.

        • threelonmusketeersOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Ah, I think we are using term “disengagement” slightly differently. A disengagement generally refers to a human driver disengaging FSD as a manual override, not a human driver being disengaged with the task of driving.