@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agoApples to Applesmander.xyzimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1500arrow-down111
arrow-up1489arrow-down1imageApples to Applesmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•7 months agoYeah, the other number wasn’t even close. I don’t think you’d even be able to fit that many on earth in the solar system galaxy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•7 months agoSorry, I’m confused by these comments. I typed “7,000”. In the US, that translates as “seven thousand”. What is wrong with that?
minus-squareAwesomeLowlanderlinkfedilinkEnglish15•7 months agoIt’s a joke. 7000! mathematically is 7000 factorial. Which means 7000 x 6999 x 6998… You can see why orchard space might be a problem.
No, it’s just over 7000.
Yeah, the other number wasn’t even close. I don’t think you’d even be able to fit that many
on earthin thesolar systemgalaxy.Sorry, I’m confused by these comments. I typed “7,000”. In the US, that translates as “seven thousand”. What is wrong with that?
It’s a joke. 7000! mathematically is 7000 factorial. Which means 7000 x 6999 x 6998…
You can see why orchard space might be a problem.
Oh… 7000! thanks.