• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    145 months ago

    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek was the first person to observe microbes. Semmelweis deserves immense credit for trying to convince people to wash their hands, but he didn’t observe microbes and believed in corpse particles. (⌐■_■)

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah. I was telling a fib for comedic effect. Semmelweis is actually a lot more impressive, to me, because he was able to deduce that something important was going on and what the solution was, without having any idea what the mechanism might be, simply from observing and following the data. He didn’t need to know the details to know it was a problem; he just trusted the evidence without needing to have a narrative built up in his head to attach it to.

      Also, once he realized it was killing people, he wouldn’t shut up about it until they literally had to kill him to make him stop. That puts him over the line from good scientist to hero, to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        Not arguing with that, but clearly people seem to believe you and think he discovered microbes, which he didn’t. The truth is more impressive anyways, no?

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          I edited it to add a correction. I shouldn’t fib for the sake of making a more entertaining link to the posting, maybe.

          • @Lizardking27
            link
            English
            15 months ago

            Maybe strikethrough the first part where you credit semmelweis with the discovery. And no, a convenient lie is never better than a complicated truth. It may seem harmless to you but you’ve just created misinformation and disseminated it to the public.