• kbal
    link
    fedilink
    125 months ago

    They want one baseball brand. One football brand. One basketball brand. One twitter. One facebook. One instagram.

    Why’s everything need to be so complicated, anyway? Can’t we just have on sportsballgame and one twitgramface?

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ironically, the thing that would allow people to use one “twitgramface” account across all the various platforms is federation. But the only way I can imagine it being seamless enough for normies is native browser integration for ActivityPub, perhaps with a new URL scheme like apub://.... Basically, save a Fediverse account in your browser, and when you open a foreign-instance link someone sends you, you’ll see a prompt:


      How do you want to open this link (apub:)?

      You can browse this content via your instance and interact with it with one of your saved Fediverse accounts, or choose an app you have installed:

      @[email protected]    ︿
      @[email protected]
      @[email protected]
      Voyager (vger.app Web App)
      Tootle (Local App)

      ☐ Remember my choice for feddit.nl
      ☐ Remember my choice across all instances

      Accept Reject

      Why am I seeing this?    ︿

      This content is on feddit.nl, which is an ActivityPub instance that 3 of your saved Fediverse accounts federate with. To use your account, open this link via your instance, or select Decline to use feddit.nl’s default web interface.


      So far, only browser extensions can do this, and not very well at that. Of course, all ActivityPub instances and clients would need to adopt this URL scheme whenever a link is shared between users, and the downside is that Reddit, Instagram, Twitter etc. will never recognize apub: links. Do you think something like this can ever happen?

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        Basically, save a Fediverse account in your browser

        Already too complicated unless it comes pre-installed on your phone as part of the setup process when you buy it.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Don’t be that pessimistic, most users had to install Reddit, Twitter and TikTok apps. In the 2010s, grassroots chain emails and Facebook posts with guides to setting up WhatsApp went viral among boomers in my country, touting it as “free SMS”. (Facebook camnot legally describe it as “free SMS” but they didn’t bother correcting anyone of course.) The fediverse experience is already quite OK if you have a dedicated client but the problem is that not everyone does, which is why we need browser support; people are tired of “wOrKs bEtTeR iN ThE aPp” even if it’s true this time. A dedicated URL scheme will automatically associate Fediverse links with any appropriate installed web/local apps. There are still other issues such as hit-and-miss cross-fedi-platform compatibility, no API for retrieving the list of federated instances and lack of appropriate error messages if the source and/or destination instance block each other.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          Grandmas can easily install Cookie Clicker and Angry Bird and DownloadMoreRam and anything else they find on the internet with quite an ease. Are you telling me the average internet person is noticeably less capable than a grandma?

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      English
      15 months ago

      And you will notice that in the vast majority of the world, the joke about the ball game happens/happened. America is very american football centric. Germany is all about football. England has cricket. Etc, etc.

      You jest, but yes, since our lives are complicated enough as is, we want our hobbies to be as straightforward and easy to communicate/communalize as possible.