• @TootSweet
    link
    English
    65 months ago

    Seems really dodgy to me making your business model holding security features hostage for either money or sign-ups, honestly.

    Kindof like charging people for vaccines against deadly diseases or something.

    But then again, my craw may be extra susceptible to sticking when it comes to such things.

    • @iopq
      link
      35 months ago

      How do you think research for vaccines is funded? Someone pays for vaccines for deadly diseases eventually

      • @TootSweet
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Preferably taxpayers. Not that that part of the analogy relates to Ubuntu.

        • @iopq
          link
          25 months ago

          In any case, the company who makes the vaccines doesn’t pay it. Ubuntu could make the argument you get the security upgrades if the government wants to pay for them

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      From my look at it, Ubuntu is making it clear that they guarantee support for 10 years, rather than just the standard 4 of LTS releases. And they are also guaranteeing compliance for enterprise uses, saving the paperwork load and time. This could make Ubuntu Pro attractive for enterprises and the IT department. Everyone wants to limit the paperwork checks. Us plebes, can make do with the free standard 4 years of LTS support if that’s what you want.

      I’m quite sure that any distro that offers enterprise solutions is doing similar things just for the money. RedHat does it for sure. But us plebes don’t ever see it because we use Fedora instead.