• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    153 months ago

    Yea, it is clear if there is just one closed-source app. But if we’re talking XMPP/Matrix - they have multiple open-source clients, even if some of them does introduce scanning, no way it wouldn’t be forked to remove it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      If a messaging service is non-compliant, the government could theoretically take action with court orders against domain owners, server owners or pursue anyone hosting a node in case of a distributed setup. In a worse case scenario, they might instruct ISPs via court orders to block these services (e.g. The Pirate Bay in some countries)

      • @MigratingtoLemmy
        link
        83 months ago

        Yeah let’s have them block github. I kind of want to see a federated git hosting platform integrated with the fediverse

        • @kbotc
          link
          English
          53 months ago

          They literally will do that. GDPR shows that they will go after big American companies (That’s the point, a huge chunk of this is protectionism to build a tech industry in the EU that they control)

        • CEbbinghaus
          link
          23 months ago

          This has actually been my dream for some time now. Not AP/Fediverse since that is built for social networks, but some platform that federates decentrally and functions closer to GitHub/Forgejo. Ideally with the ability to fork repositories across servers and the ability to hook up hosted runners github style. It would be an absolute dream to have a platform that lets anyone explore projects from any of the other nodes and build upon them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        Where I live, a lot of popular services, including major foreign social media and torrents everyone uses, are blocked - yet they still have a massive userbase.

        And since the scanning is supposed to be client-side, how would a server check if the scanning was really performed? What if the server does receive and log the needed responses, just to be safe, but the client actually just sends them automatically while lacking such functionality?