• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    305 months ago

    I think people believe that the ARM ISA brings a power efficient design but what really made Apple able to sip power on the M1 was a decade of phone processor design experience and full control of the software stack.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      215 months ago

      The people working on Snapdragon X Elite are supposedly the same people that worked on the M1 and M2 chips. They made their own company to make ARM chips before being acquired by qualcomm. I was hoping for similar gains…

      • @GamingChairModel
        link
        English
        145 months ago

        I’ve been a general skeptic of exactly how much the power and performance to power stats are attributable to the ARM instruction set or architecture versus the fact that Apple just locks up TSMC’s latest and greatest node for a year before everyone else. AMD’s CPUs are still x86_64 but achieve similar performance per watt as the Apple silicon on the same node and similar TDPs.

        So if it turns out that TSMC has the secret sauce, then maybe we don’t need to move laptops over to ARM at all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      I thought it was the deal with (what was it, TSMC?), they got the new nm generation first?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        It’s a mixed bag. The smaller nodes have bigger problems with static leakage power, Vs dynamic switching power (which goes down)