• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    06 months ago

    I don’t dispute the benefit of producing cars on home soil, wherever that home soil is. My snideness was in regards to the PR aspect of it. I can pretty much guarantee, that at no point did anyone at any of these companies make a decision with this league table in mind. It just seems to be, “America, fuck yeah!” for the sake of it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      I think it’s more of a “we don’t want covid supply chains V2” with a bonus of “why not benefit Americans too?” Plus are you really buying an “American” car if it’s made in Malaysia?

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        I hear you, but does it benefit Americans when the reality is that cars produced on American soil are more expensive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          If the car costs $1000 more, but pays American workers $5,000 does that benefit Americans more?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              For the same car? And with or without exploitative labor practices?

              The only reason they make cars in places like China or Malaysia is because they can pay them almost nothing, and treat them like slaves.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                What I mean is for an equivalent. If you compare the price of a Ford to a Kia, the Kia is cheaper.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  A Ford and a Kia might be in the same category of car, but they’re almost not comparable.

                  Take the 2017 Ford Focus vs the 2017 Kia Forte, two cars my friend was looking at buying. The Focus sure ain’t a sports car, but it handles well for a cheap compact sedan. The Forte handles like a tin can on wheels. The wheels are 10mm smaller at every tire size vs the Focus, the suspension is both firmer, and less precise (incorrectly balanced spring rate vs dampening vs rebound) and because of that the car reorientates itself on every big bump you hit, bumps that the Focus handles fine. The wheel well liner is made out of hard plastic on the Kia, the Focus is plastic, but with a cloth liner on it to reduce road noise. And sounds like there’s no sound deadening anywhere in the cabin. The Focus is surprisingly quiet of a cabin for a car of it’s price point. The 2017 Focus has a rear view camera as standard, the Forte it’s optional.

                  According to cars.com: Focus - Forte

                  The base model Focus starts at $16,775, the Forte starts at $16,600

                  According to the NHTSA the Focus scores 5 stars on every category except rollover. The Forte scores 5 stars in only 8/12 categories. I can’t find any of the updated crash test ratings for these vehicles, but recently they updated the side crash test ratings and a bunch of the “safe on paper” cars tanked in their rating. But both vehicles I’m sure are only safe on paper.

                  Plus nowadays there’s a much bigger difference between the two cars. The Kia lacks an immobilizer. Until 2021 Kias with a standard key lacked an immobilizer which is absolutely inexcusable. So that $500 you saved on the initial purchase price translates to $500 extra paid per year.

                  • @[email protected]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    26 months ago

                    I dunno, these new Kia EVs are pretty nice. They’re everywhere in London. I don’t even see any electric Fords.