How stupid do you have to be to believe that only 8% of companies have seen failed AI projects? We can’t manage this consistently with CRUD apps and people think that this number isn’t laughable? Some companies have seen benefits during the LLM craze, but not 92% of them. 34% of companies report that generative AI specifically has been assisting with strategic decision making? What the actual fuck are you talking about?

I don’t believe you. No one with a brain believes you, and if your board believes what you just wrote on the survey then they should fire you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    456 months ago

    I use them like wikipedia: it’s a good starting point and that’s it (and this comparison is a disservice to wikipedia).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 months ago

      Yep! It’s a good way to get over the fear of a blank page, but I don’t trust it for more than outlines or summaries

      • @ripcord
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        Man, I need to build some new shit.

        I can’t remember the last time I looked at a blank page.

        • @mPony
          link
          English
          26 months ago

          Blank pages are for the young

      • deweydecibel
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        I wouldn’t even trust it for summaries beyond extremely basic stuff.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      I agree with your parenthetical, but Wikipedia actually agrees on your main point: Wikipedia itself is not a source of truth.