• @Bertuccio
    link
    English
    27 days ago

    Sorry. I didn’t realize I was talking to the man in the article.

    • @Madison420
      link
      English
      07 days ago

      That’s a non argument.

      “You’re a bad person! How dare you ask a legitimate question in a respectful way!”

      Rather than “x is because of y” or “I’m sorry I’m not sure I can answer that” but rather going out of your way to be cruel.

      So fun question, how is the way you’re talking to me not dehumanizing.

      • @Bertuccio
        link
        English
        27 days ago

        Oh it is dehumanizing. You’re crazy.

        • @Madison420
          link
          English
          17 days ago

          See another non answer and an insult. If you had an argument you’d make it and clearly you haven’t because you don’t. If someone asks a question maybe be nice or I dunno keep your hateful inside shit inside to save for a therapist.

          • @Bertuccio
            link
            English
            16 days ago

            No one owes you the pretense that you’re not a kook.

            Several people have given you reasonable answers and your responses have ranged from irrational nonsense to TimeCube lunacy.

            Having given a reasonable answer and gotten tinfoil craziness in response, no rational person is going to continue interacting with you like you’re rational.

            • @Madison420
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I never said now implied anyone owed me anything, that’s all in your imagination but does sorta parse or the type of person you are.

              Yes, we are having a conversation, ie. An exchange of ideas and ideals. If someone says ““x is because of y” doesn’t make sense to me because q is not y” for future reference the answer is almost never going to be “hah retard! Why are you so retarded!”.

              They’re not tinfoil crazy questions or they’d be easy to answer, the fact you haven’t answered them and instead turned to personal insults based on your personal perceptions of me proves you can’t answer the question. You’re literally proving my point as to why perception of offense is different than intended offense.

              Hilariously inept, love it.

              • @Kethal
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                I like that you call some nonsense about woman meaning wifeman an “exchange of ideas”. It’s utter nonsense, so in what sense is it an idea - that you thought of it? Or have you been reading “A history of English words for people with preconceived notions”?

                • @Madison420
                  link
                  English
                  06 days ago

                  That’s is literally it’s origin, I’m sorry facts are offensive to you.

                  https://www.etymonline.com/word/woman

                  adult female human," late Old English wimman, wiman (plural wimmen), literally “woman-man,” alteration of wifman (plural wifmen) “woman, female servant” (8c.), a compound of wif “woman” (see wife) + man “human being” (in Old English used in reference to both sexes; see man (n.)). Compare Dutch vrouwmens “wife,” literally “woman-man.”

                  Takes three seconds to look up bud.

                  • @Kethal
                    link
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    Yeah buddy. That doesn’t say it means or has ever meant wifeman. Woman has always, from its first use up to now, meant a female human. So you read things and then interpret them as having whatever meaning you like?

                  • @Bertuccio
                    link
                    English
                    16 days ago

                    Yet you didn’t bother to read it…