• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      That’s a good question. I think I’ll take a sequel 40 years later over an awful remake that’s bound to change a lot of the original story.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        I think you’re right. As an example there’s the Paul Rudd Ghostbusters movies. Ok sequel, nothing really wrong with it. The second one wasn’t watchable, but at least they’re not trying to replace the originals.