• kim_harding ✅
    link
    fedilink
    195 months ago

    @SpaceCowboy @return2ozma ~60% of Tesla’s profits come from the sale of carbon credits, which enable other massive vehicles that run on fossil fuels to be built. E-cars are not about “saving the planet” they are pure Greenwash which is saving the motor industry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      That’s more of a problem with how carbon credits are being regulated. Sure Tesla are being assholes for doing this, but it’s a corporation, I don’t expect them to be good guys.

      But none of that changes the fact that some meathead buying a Cybertruck instead of the equivalent fossil fuel monstrosity is reducing CO2 emissions in a direct way. Spray paint the sign a Tesla corporate HQ, don’t damage a vehicle which will only have the result of someone driving a fossil fuel vehicle a little longer while the damage is being fixed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        If somehow murder became not illegal, it wouldn’t make all the corpses not murderer’s problem.

      • gila
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Literally the state of California would have lower CO2 emissions today if Tesla didn’t exist.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          You’re assuming unscrupulous companies wouldn’t find another loophole or just pay a fine for going over the limit.

          Don’t get me wrong, Tesla is shit for helping with the loophole, but it’s a degrees of bad kind of thing. Getting fossil fuel vehicles off the road does reduce carbon emissions, but Tesla was exaggerating their numbers. They should be punished for doing this, but doubling up their numbers only works if the number isn’t zero.

          But this is all getting away from the fact that damaging these vehicles has the net effect of people driving fossil fuel vehicles longer. It’s a net harm to everyone.

          • gila
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Unscrupulous companies in this case referring to every car manufacturer, they wouldn’t have a systemic incentive to foster an EV monopoly that is anti-consumer and actively stymies the growth of the local EV sector.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      No way, that is positively enormous.

      Even carbon credit companies that do their best aren’t always (are often?) not great. e.g. trees may be planted, but:

      • locals’ may have been misappropriated for the purpose
      • you might go back five years later and find all the trees were cut down

      It seems like there is some progress with that technology that… throws gravel onto beaches or something, to be broken down by waves. Really hope it’s not total BS.