• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    75% of American drinking water needs treatment to reduce particulate and parasites, and the treatment additive used to render the water safe is produced at a single chemical plant located in an area of severe flood risk – which means that a flood could take it offline for a day or two, or damage it for weeks.

    (Efforts to build a second site recently fell through due to ever-changing regulations. Of course they’re stockpiling it in some mountain bunker, I’m sure)

    The next Katrina could give us a brain-worms infestation via tap-water.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      256 months ago

      Are you saying the chemical plant provides the treatment or that one plant is somehow responsible for polluting 75% of American drinking water?

      • @bitchkat
        link
        English
        126 months ago

        He’s saying the one factory that provides the chemicals is under risk of being flooded.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      196 months ago

      I don’t know the details about alum production (assuming that is what you are referring to), but there are many alternative coagulants available now. Sure the supply logistics would be incredibly challenging and many people would have to boil their water or use point-of-use filters, but this take is pretty doomer in my opinion. Most plants use alum because it’s cheap and easy, not because it’s their only option.