Sorry I’m dumb and misread it. Its technically false but that’s disingenuous. My brain read it as “could power <number> more homes…” Which is false because supply and demand stuff. I’m kind of a stickler for (against?) lying with statistics.
Ok, check the stat sources. Right. I’m betting they are valid just thinking about how much fossil fuels are expended in a war, how much all those bombs and weapons cost, and how good solar can be in a sunny climate like the US Southwest or the Middle East.
What claim is not true? There are several claims. You just deny it and that suffices, Kai Ro? The “moment” is rigged for you.
Sorry I’m dumb and misread it. Its technically false but that’s disingenuous. My brain read it as “could power <number> more homes…” Which is false because supply and demand stuff. I’m kind of a stickler for (against?) lying with statistics.
Ok, check the stat sources. Right. I’m betting they are valid just thinking about how much fossil fuels are expended in a war, how much all those bombs and weapons cost, and how good solar can be in a sunny climate like the US Southwest or the Middle East.
Yeah they are likely valid. Like I said–i’m a stickler.